Updated:
Tuesday December 30, 2008
There are a host of elected officials and other community leaders who, if they haven't done so already, need to clear some significant time on their Thursday schedules to attend the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's public meetings on the siting, construction and operation of the planned National Bio- and Agro-Defense Facility. A 67-acre University of Georgia-owned tract on South Milledge Avenue at Whitehall Road is among the finalists as a potential NBAF site.
Among those who should be seen and heard during the Thursday sessions at the Georgia Center for Continuing at 1197 S. Lumpkin St. on the University of Georgia campus are Athens-Clarke County Mayor Heidi Davison, all 10 Athens-Clarke commissioners, Athens Area Chamber of Commerce President Doc Eldridge and the University of Georgia administrators who've been advocating Athens-Clarke County as the best site for the NBAF.
There will be ample opportunity for those local leaders to be seen and heard. The DHS is hosting two four-hour sessions Thursday, from 12:30-4:30 p.m., and again from 6-10 p.m. According to DHS, each session will comprise a one-hour open house during which participants can talk with experts on NBAF-related topics and view informational materials, as well as register to provide oral comments later in the meeting. The open house will be followed by a one-hour DHS presentation on the recently released Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the NBAF. The final two hours of each session will be dedicated to recording oral comments on the environmental impact statement.
Until recently, local debate over siting the federal animal disease research facility has focused largely on risk factors.
On the one hand, NBAF opponents have argued that even the DHS's own Draft Environmental Impact Statement provides evidence that the facility carries an unacceptable risk for the community. At one point, the document suggests that any escape of mosquitoes used in the lab for transmitting viruses "... could lead to a more rapid dispersal of the diseases to larger human populations ... and ultimately lead to a permanent reservoir of virus."
On the other hand, NBAF proponents with scientific expertise have countered the draft environmental document contemplates worst-case scenarios. In a July 15 opinion piece in this newspaper, UGA Vice President for Research David Lee wrote the document "described worst-case scenarios for outbreaks from the facility, no matter how unlikely the chain of events leading to these scenarios. A worst-case scenario is not a likely scenario."
Recent days, however, have brought information that moves the debate over the NBAF out of the somewhat murky arena of risk tolerance versus risk avoidance in pursuit of economic development.
An Associated Press report published Monday in this newspaper revealed that a senior Homeland Security official, a political appointee, overruled government experts appointed by the agency and moved a Flora, Miss., site up on the list of potential NBAF sites, despite the site having been scored lower than a number of other potential locations. The AP story noted "Mississippi's lawmakers include Rep. Bennie Thompson, the Democratic chairman of the (Homeland Security) department's oversight committee ... and Sen. Thad Cochran, the senior Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee, which is expected to approve money to build" the research facility.
No one should be surprised politics has become a factor in deciding where to locate a multimillion-dollar federal facility that carries the promise of being a boon to economic development. It is, however, fair now to wonder how politics might figure into the future development of the NBAF - in terms, for instance, of the selection of construction contractors and facility administrators. Those decisions will, of course, have direct bearing on how safely the NBAF will be built and operated.
That's why the community leaders who have been consistent NBAF boosters need to be in attendance at Thursday's DHS meetings. They need to be on record questioning whether politics will continue to play a role in establishing the NBAF.
It's certainly all right for local leaders looking for needed economic development opportunities to rely on assurances from highly trained and experienced researchers the NBAF can be operated safely. It would, however, be the height of irresponsibility for that leadership to turn a blind eye to the danger posed when politics is inserted into a process that must be nothing less than a scientifically rigorous enterprise.
Published in the Athens Banner-Herald on 081308
Link